What Does It Take to Qualify as a Personal Injury Case in Michigan?

Most people who call a personal injury law firm have already spent time wondering whether what happened to them is worth a call at all. They are not sure what qualifies. They do not know what the firm is actually looking for. And they do not want to waste anyone’s time — including their own.

Rob Buchanan has been evaluating personal injury cases in Michigan for decades. Before he started Buchanan Firm, he spent years on the defense side — the side whose entire job is to make sure injured people get paid as little as possible. He learned exactly what it takes to build a case and exactly how the other side tries to tear one apart. That knowledge crossed the aisle with him.

What follows is the framework Rob uses to evaluate every case that comes through the door — personal injury, medical malpractice, and vehicle accidents alike. Three required elements, one additional factor nobody talks about openly, and the honest answer to who should and should not pursue a claim in Michigan.

If you are trying to figure out whether you have a case before you pick up the phone, this is the closest thing to a real answer you will find.

How Long Do You Have to File a Personal Injury Claim in Michigan?

Before Rob looks at anything else, he asks one question: is this claim still viable?

“These claims have statutes of limitations. They’re only feasible like a gallon of milk. They’re only good for a certain period of time. And if you go past that expiration date, I can’t help you. That’s spoiled milk.”

The window varies by case type:

Medical malpractice — two years from the date of the alleged malpractice. Michigan law also requires a notice of intent to be filed before a lawsuit can proceed, which adds a layer of timing that makes early action especially important.

Vehicle accidents — three years from the date of the crash.

Personal injury — three years from the date of the injury.

These are not technicalities. They are threshold questions. If the window has closed, the three-legged framework does not matter. The case is spoiled milk and no attorney in Michigan can change that.

Caiti takes calls like this more than she would like to. A woman called Buchanan Firm after a medical procedure she believed had caused serious harm. She had done her research, she had a story worth hearing, and her two-year window had already closed. There was nothing left to file. Caiti stayed on the phone, explained exactly what Michigan law said and why, and made sure the woman understood her options going forward. It was not a billable interaction. It was the hardest kind of call to take.

If something happened — a surgery that went wrong, a crash, an injury caused by someone else’s negligence — and you have been sitting on it, call sooner rather than later.

People wait because they are not sure they have a case. They wait because they are still recovering. They wait because the process feels overwhelming before it even starts. All of that is understandable. None of it stops the clock.

What Does Negligence Mean in a Personal Injury Case?

The first leg of the stool is liability. Before anything else, someone has to have made a mistake.

Rob does not use the word accident lightly. In his view, most of the cases that come through Buchanan Firm’s door are not accidents at all. An accident implies nobody is at fault — a true accident is when two things collide and neither party could have prevented it. What he sees most often is something different. A driver who crossed the center line. A surgeon who operated on the wrong site. A hospital that had a test result and ignored it. These are preventable events caused by someone’s disregard for safety, not bad luck.

Negligence has a specific meaning in the law. It means someone fell below the standard of care — the level of conduct a reasonable person or provider would have met in the same situation. A driver running a red light. A physician who dismissed a symptom that warranted imaging. A facility that knew about a risk and did nothing about it.

The standard shifts depending on the case type. Medical malpractice requires proving a deviation from accepted medical practice. Vehicle accident cases require establishing a clear breach of duty on the road. The threshold differs but the question is the same — did someone fail to do what they should have done?

Here is what most people do not know: defense attorneys do not need to win on all three legs. They only need to knock one out. Negligence is the leg they attack first. They will argue the provider acted within reasonable bounds, that the driver had no viable alternative, that the outcome was unforeseeable. Their job is to make the mistake look like a judgment call. Rob’s job is to make sure it does not.

We’ll listen, give you honest answers, and guide you every step of the way

so you can focus on healing, not fighting.

What Is Causation in a Personal Injury Case — and Why Does It Matter?

Proving negligence is not enough. The second leg requires something more specific: the negligence must have directly caused the injury.

This is the element that surprises people most. A driver runs a red light and there is a crash — that is negligence. But if the injuries being claimed were pre-existing and the crash did not worsen them, causation becomes the question the entire case pivots on. The mistake happened. The injury exists. But did one cause the other?

In medical malpractice cases this is the most complex element of the three. A provider deviated from the standard of care — but would the outcome have been different if they had not? A diagnosis was delayed — but did the delay change the prognosis, or was the condition already beyond the point where earlier intervention would have mattered? These are not rhetorical questions. They are the questions a defense team will spend years trying to answer in their favor.

This is where expert witnesses become essential. The firm does not retain experts until the case is solid. Expert review costs money — sometimes significant money — and a weak causation argument is a losing case regardless of how clear the negligence was. Rob evaluates causation carefully before anyone signs anything, because taking a case with a shaky second leg means putting a real person through years of litigation for an outcome that was never going to hold.

Defense strategy on causation is consistent across case types: the injury existed before, the condition would have progressed regardless, the outcome was inevitable. Their goal is to sever the connection between what the defendant did and what happened to the plaintiff. Causation is where cases that look strong on paper quietly fall apart.

How Serious Does an Injury Have to Be to Pursue a Personal Injury Case?

The third leg is damages. And it is the one that requires the most honest conversation.

Personal injury cases are expensive to build. Expert witnesses, medical record review, depositions, trial preparation — a case can cost $50,000 to $100,000 to pursue properly. That reality shapes every evaluation Rob does. If the injury is not significant enough to justify that investment, taking the case is not a service to the client — it is a disservice.

Rob’s example: “someone calls after swallowing a fly in a soda. They think they hit the lottery. A jury does not”. Most attorneys do not. There is no permanent damage, no long-term impact, no economic loss. That is not a case.

Significant damages means something a jury can see and quantify — permanent injury, long-term impact on quality of life, lost wages, ongoing medical costs, a life that looks measurably different than it did before. The harm has to be real, documentable, and lasting.

Age factors into the damages calculation in ways people do not always expect. A 35-year-old with a career-ending injury has decades of economic loss in front of them. A 75-year-old who is retired presents a different financial picture. Not impossible to pursue — but the numbers have to support the investment.

Rob’s framing on this is direct: “if you recovered quickly and fully, that is genuinely good news. It is also the honest reason a case may not be worth pursuing. The goal is never to talk someone into a legal process that does not serve them.”

What Else Does Buchanan Firm Look for Before Taking a Case?

Every case that clears all three legs gets evaluated against one more question: will a jury like this person?

Rob is direct about it. The firm has a target profile — significant injuries, clear negligence, strong causation, and a person a jury wants to help. Defense attorneys will surface everything before trial. Criminal history, past behavior, personal habits, social media. Whatever they can find, they will use. The firm looks for all of it first.

That is not judgment. It is protection. Taking the wrong client through three years of depositions, medical reviews, and trial preparation to a verdict that fails them is the worst outcome the firm can deliver — worse than not taking the case at all. The people Buchanan represents deserve a real chance at the outcome they came for. A client a jury does not want to help cannot get that, regardless of how strong the other three legs are.

For a deeper look at how this factor plays out in real cases and what it means for the evaluation process — Leslie Caliguri covers it in detail on her page.

What Happens After the Buchanan Firm Decides to Take Your Case?

When all three legs hold — negligence, causation, significant damages — and the fourth factor clears, Rob is direct about what that means.

“If we take your claim, it means it’s serious. And if the other side won’t resolve it — we’re coming after them.”

Buchanan Firm is not a billboard practice. Not a volume operation that signs everything that comes through the door and settles fast for whatever the insurance company offers first. Every case that gets signed has passed through Caiti Hill’s intake evaluation, Rob’s framework, and in most cases an independent expert review — before a single document is filed.

Rob has a way of framing the firm’s selectivity that cuts through the noise. They are not for everyone. Cases with strong merit, significant injury, and a client the team can stand behind all the way to a courtroom if necessary. That is the profile. Anything short of it does not serve the client — and Buchanan is not interested in cases that do not serve the client.

That selectivity is also what protects the people who do get signed. A firm that takes weak cases is not doing anyone a favor. It is putting real people through years of depositions, medical reviews, and uncertainty for an outcome that was never likely to hold. Rob views that as a failure — not a business loss, a failure to the person who trusted the firm with the worst thing that ever happened to them.

A medical professional holds an X-ray of a spine, with a laptop displaying medical images in the foreground.

Not Sure if You Have a Case? Start Here.

Rob built this framework from decades of watching both sides of the table — what plaintiffs need to prove and exactly how defense teams try to dismantle it. He knows where cases fall apart before they are ever filed, and he knows what a strong one looks like before a single record is pulled.

If you are not sure whether what happened to you meets the standard, that uncertainty is exactly what the first call is for. Caiti will evaluate it. Rob will be honest about what he sees. And if the answer is that you do not have a case, you will leave the conversation knowing exactly why — and what your options are from that point forward.

The call is free, the evaluation is free, and the answers are real.

FAQ: What Does It Take to Qualify as a Personal Injury Case in Michigan?

What are the three things needed to pursue a personal injury case in Michigan?

Every personal injury case requires three elements: negligence, causation, and significant damages. Negligence means someone fell below the standard of care. Causation means that negligence directly caused the injury. Significant damages means the harm is serious enough — permanent, documentable, and financially substantial enough — to justify pursuing a case.

For most personal injury and vehicle accident cases, three years from the date of the injury. Medical malpractice claims have a two-year window from the date of the alleged malpractice. Michigan law also requires a notice of intent before a medical malpractice lawsuit can be filed, which makes early action especially important.

Two years from the date of the alleged malpractice. A notice of intent must also be filed before a lawsuit can proceed. If you are unsure whether your window is still open, call as soon as possible — the clock does not stop.

Permanent damage, long-term impact on quality of life, lost wages, and ongoing medical costs. If you recovered quickly and fully, the injury may not meet the threshold to make pursuing a case financially viable — for the firm or for you.

Causation means the negligence directly caused the injury. It is not enough that someone made a mistake and you were hurt — the mistake must be what caused the harm. This is the element defense teams attack most aggressively, arguing that injuries were pre-existing or that the outcome was inevitable regardless of the defendant’s actions.

Negligence means someone fell below the standard of care a reasonable person or provider would have met in the same situation. A driver who crossed the center line, a physician who ignored a test result, a facility that disregarded a known risk — these are not accidents. They are preventable failures.

Every case is evaluated against the three required elements plus an assessment of jury likability and the financial viability of pursuing the claim. Cases that pass that evaluation go through Caiti Hill’s intake process, Rob’s framework review, and often an independent expert review before anything is filed. The firm is selective by design — because taking a weak case is a failure to the client, not just a business decision.

No. The consultation is free and so is the medical record review. Even if the firm does not take the case, there is no charge. You will leave the conversation knowing where you stand.

Both require the same three elements — negligence, causation, and significant damages — but medical malpractice cases are among the most complex to pursue. They require expert testimony to establish the standard of care, carry a shorter statute of limitations, and involve a mandatory notice of intent before a lawsuit can be filed. The bar is higher and the timeline is tighter.

Have Questions
for us?

Our chat feature connects you directly
with Caiti from our team!